Composites
At the University of Texas at El Paso
===========
Bibliographies
Composites, Composite Construction and Related Things
Al Qayedi A; Clark AF. (1999). Algorithm for face and facial feature location based on grey scale information and facial geometry. IEE Conference Publication. n 465 II , p 625 629
Archer K., Coughlan K., Forsey, D. & Struben S. (1998). Software tools for craniofacial growth and reconstruction. Proceedings Graphics Interface. p 73 81
Aspley Limited. (1993). E-fit. Hatfield, UK: Ashley Limited.
Atick, J. J., Griffin, P. A. & Redlich, A. N. (1996). Statistical approach to shape from shading: Reconstruction of three dimensional face surfaces from single two dimensional images. Neural Computation, 8(6): 1321 1340
Baenninger, M. (1994). The development of face recognition: Featural or configurationalprocessing? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 57(3): 377 396
Bennett, P.J. (1986). Face recall: A police perspective. Human Learning, 5, 197 202.
Boylan, J. (2001). Portraits of Guilt: The Woman Who Profiles the Faces of America's Deadliest Criminals. NY: Pocket Star Books.
Brigham, J. C.& Cairns, D. L. (1988). The effect of mugshot inspections on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 18(16, Pt 2): 1394 1410
Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 311 318.
Bruce, V. (1988). Recognizing faces. Sussex, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bruce, V. (1990). Face recognition. In M. W. Eysenck (Ed.), Cognitive Psychology: An International Review. (pp. 221 263), London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Bruce, V., Hanna, E., Dench, N., Healey, P. & Burton, M. (1992).. The importance of mass in line drawings of faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 619 628.
Bruce, V., Ness, H., Hancock, P. J., Newman, C., & Rarity, J. (2002). Four heads are better than one: Combining face composites yields improvements in face likeness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 894-902.
Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Greenwood, K., Hancock, P J B, Burton, A M. & Miller, P. (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. Vol 5(4): 339 360
Bruyer, R. & Crispeels, G. (1992). Expertise in person recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 501 504.
Cabeza, R. & Kato, T. (2000). Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11(5), 429 433.
Cabeza, Roberto; Bruce, Vicki; Kato, Takashi; Oda, Masaomi. (1999).The prototype effect in face recognition: Extension and limits. Memory and Cognition. 27(1): 139 151
Cabeza, Roberto; Kato, Takashi. Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science. 2000 Sep; Vol 11(5): 429 433
Campbell, Ruth; Walker, Jane; Baron Cohen, Simon. The development of differential use of inner and outer face features in familiar face identification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1995 Apr; Vol 59(2): 196 210
Chance, J. & Goldstein, A.G. (1976). Recognition of faces and verbal labels. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 384 386.
Christie, D. F. M. & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Photofit constructions versus verbal descriptions of faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 358 363.
Christie, D. F.; Ellis, Hadyn D. Photofit constructions versus verbal descriptions of faces. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1981 Jun; Vol 66(3): 358 363
Christie, D., Davies, G. Shepherd, J. & Ellis, H. D. Evaluating a new computer based system for face recall. Law and Human Behavior. 1981; Vol 5(2 sup 3): 209 218
Chuang Mao Meng; Chang Ruey Feng; Huang Yu Len. Automatic facial feature extraction in model based coding. Journal of Information Science and Engineering. v 16 n 3 May 2000, p 447 458
Clifford. B.R.. & Davies. G. M. (1989). Procedures for obtaining identification evidence. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 47 96). New York: Springer.
Comish, S. E.. Recognition of facial stimuli following an intervening task involving the Identi kit. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1987 Aug; Vol 72(3): 488 491
Cutler, B. L. & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken Identification: The Eyewitness, Psychology, & the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Jury decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-56.
Cutler, B.L., Stocklein, C.J. & Penrod, S.D. (1988). Empirical examination of a computerized facial composite production system. Forensic Reports, 1(3), 207 218.
Davies, G M., Ellis, H., & Shepherd, J., (1985). Wanted faces that fit the bill: Indentikit or Photofit pictures issued by police are often built on misleading assumptions. New Scientist,106, p. 26 9
Davies, G. (1983a). Forensic face recall: The role of visual and verbal information. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating Witness Evidence: Recent Psychological Research and New Perspectives (pp. 103-136). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Davies, G. M. & Christie, D. (1982). Face recall: An examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 (1), 103 109.
Davies, G. M. & Oldman, Heidi. The impact of character attribution on composite production: A real world effect? SO: Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social. 1999 Spr; Vol 18(1): 128 139
Davies, G. M. (1981). Face recall systems. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and Remembering Faces (pp. 227 250). London: Academic Press.
Davies, G. M. (1983a). Forensic face recall: The role of visual and verbal information. In S. Lloyd Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating Witness Evidence: Recent Psychological Research and New Perspectives (pp. 103 136). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Davies, G. M. (1983b). Composite systems for recalling faces: Helping the police with their enquiries. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the Past: Proceedings of the Stockholm Symposium on Witness Psychology (pp. 299 313). Deventer: Kluwer.
Davies, G. M. (1986a). Capturing likenesses in eyewitness composites: The police artist and his rivals. Medical Science and Law, 26, 283 90.
Davies, G. M. (1986b). The recall and reconstruction of faces: Implications for theory and practice. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of Face Processing (pp. 388 397). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Davies, G. M. (Ed.). (1981). Face recall systems. London: Academic Press.
Davies, G. M., & Milne, A. (1985). Eyewitness composite production: A function of mental or physical reinstatement of context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 209 220.
Davies, G. M., Ellis, H., & Shepherd, J. (1978). Face identification: The influence of delay upon accuracy of Photofit construction. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 76, 35 42.
Davies, G. M., Ellis, H., & Shepherd, J. (1981). Perceiving and remembering faces. London: Academic Press.
Davies, G. M., Ellis, Hadyn; Shepherd, John. Cue saliency in faces as assessed by the Photofit technique. Perception. 1977; Vol 6(3): 263 269
Davies, G. M., Milne, A., & Shepherd, J. W. (1983). Searching for operator skills in face composite reproduction. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 11, 405 409.
Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1978). Remembering faces: Acknowledging our limitations. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 18, 19 24.
Davies, G. M., Shepherd, John; Ellis, Hadyn. Effects of interpolated mugshot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1979 Apr; Vol 64(2): 232 237
Davies, G. M., van der Willik, P. & Morrison, L.J. (2000). Facial composite production: A comparison of mechanical and computer driven systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 119 124.
Davies, G., & Little, M. (1990). Drawing on memory: Exploring the expertise of a police artist. Medicine, Science, & the Law, 30(4), 345 353.
Davies, G., Ellis, H., & Shepherd, J. (1978). Face identification: The influence of delay upon accuracy of Photofit construction. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 76, 35-42.
Davies, G.M. (1983). Forensic face recall: the role of visual and verbal information. In S.M.A. Lloyd Bostock & B.R Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence : recent psychological research and new perspectives. (pp. 103 123). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
Davies, G.M. (1996). Mistaken identification: Where law meets psychology head on. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 232 24 1.
Davies, G.M., van der Willik, P. & Mordson, L.J. (2000). Facial composite production: A comparison of mechanical and computer driven systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 119 124.
Davies, L. (1990). Drawing on memory: Exploring the expertise of a police artist. Medical Science and Law, 30(4), 345 353.
Davies. G. M. & Milne, A. (1985). Eyewitness composite production as a function of mental or physical reinstatement of context. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 12, 209 230.
Deffenbacher, K. & Horney, J. (1981). Psycho legal aspects of face identification. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and Remembering Faces (pp. 201 226). London: Academic Press.
Dekle, Dawn Jeanine. The effects of testing delay and composite viewing on identification accuracy in lineups and showups.. Dissertation Abstracts International. 1993; Vol 54(5 B): 2791
Deregowski, J. B., Ellis, H. D., & Shepherd, J. W. (1975). Descriptions of white and black faces by white and black subjects. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 119 123.
Diamond, R. & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(2), 107 117.
Ellis, Andrew W.; Burton, A. Mike; Young, Andy; Flude, Brenda M..(1997). Repetition priming between parts and wholes: Tests of a computational model of familiar face recognition. British Journal of Psychology. 88(4): 579 608
Ellis, H. D. & Shepherd, J. W. (1992). Face memory: Theory and practice. In Gruneberg, Morris, & Sykes, Eds.) Aspects of Memory, Vol 1 (pp. 136-143). London: Routledge.
Ellis, H. D. (1981). Theoretical aspects of face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and Remembering Faces (pp. 171 197). London: Academic Press.
Ellis, H. D. (1984). Practical aspects of face memory. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 2 37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, H. D. (1986). Face recall: A psychological perspective. Human Learning, 5, 189 196.
Ellis, H. D., & Shepherd, J. W. (Ed.). (1993). Face memory: Theory and practice. (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
Ellis, H. D., Davies, G. M., & Shepherd, J. W. (1978). A critical examination of the Photo-fit system for recalling faces. Ergonomics, 21(4), 297-307.
Ellis, H., Shepherd, J., & Davies, G. (1975). An investigation of the use of the Photo-fit technique for recalling faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 29-37.
Ellis, H.D. & Shepherd, J.W. (1992). Face memory: Theory and practice. In Gruneberg, Morris, & Sykes, Eds.) Aspects of Memory, Vol 1 (pp. 136 143). London: Routledge.
Ellis, H.D., Davies, G.M. & Shepherd, J.W. (1978). A critical examination of the Photofit system for recalling faces. Ergonomics, 21, 297 307.
Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W. & Davies, G.M. (1975). An investigation of the use of the Photofit technique for recalling faces. British Journal of Psychology , 66, 409 26.
Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W. & Davies, G.M. (1980). The deterioration of verbal descriptions over different delay intervals. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8, 101 106.
Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W., Flin, R.H., & Davies, G.M. (1989). Identification from a computer driven retrieval system compared with a traditional mug shot album search: A new tool for police investigation. Ergonomics, 32, 167 177.
Ellis, H. D.; Davies, G. M.; McMurran, M. M.. Recall of White and Black faces by White and Black witnesses using the Photofit system. Human Factors. 1979 Feb; Vol 21(1): 55 59
Ellis, H. D.; Davies, G. M.; Shepherd, J. W.. Remembering pictures of real and unreal faces: Some practical and theoretical considerations. British Journal of Psychology. 1978 Nov; Vol 69(4): 467 474
Fallshore, M. & Schooler, J. W. (1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1608 1623.
Faw, H. W. (1992). Recognition of unfamiliar faces: Procedural and methodological considerations. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 25 37.
Fisher, R. P. & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
Flin, R., Markham, R., & Davies, D. (1989). Making faces: Developmental trends in the construction and recognition of Photofit face composites. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10, 131 145.
Frowd, C. D., Carson, D., Ness, H., McQuiston, D., Richardson, J., Baldwin, H., et al. (2004). Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. Manuscript under review.
Frowd, C.D., Carson, D., Ness, H., Richardson, J., Morrison, L., McLanaghan, S., et al. (in press). A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems. Psychology, Crime & Law.
Gibling, F.. & Bennett. P. (1994). Artistic enhancement in the production of Photo FIT likenesses: An examination of its effectiveness in leading to suspect identification. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1,93 100.
Goldstein, A. & Chance, J. (1971). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 237 241.
Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E., & Schneller, G. R. (1989). Frequency of eyewitness identification in criminal cases: A survey of prosecutors. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 71 74.
Goldstein, A. G., Johnson, K. S., & Chance, J. E. (1979). Does fluency of face description imply superior face recognition? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13(1), 15 18.
Green, D.L. & Geiselman, R.E. (1989). Building composite facial images: Effects of feature saliency and delay of construction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 714 721.
Guenter, B., Grimm, C., Wood, D., Malvar, H., & Pighin, F. (1998). TI: Making faces. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York, NY, USA. p 55 65
Hancock PJB. Evolving faces from principal components. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. vol.32, no.2; May 2000; p.327 33
Hancock, P.J.B., Burton, A.M. & Bruce, V. (1996). Face processing: human perception and principal component analysis. Memory and cognition, 24, 26 40.
Higgins J. Photofit. Personal Computer World. vol.6, no.11; Nov. 1983; p.162 5
Hole, Graham J.. Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception. 1994; Vol 23(1): 65 74
IQ Biometrix (1998). FACES [Computer software]. InterQuest, Inc.
Jenkins, D. (1985). Contamination of facial memory through exposure to misleading composite pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 164 176.
Jenkins, F., & Davies, G. Contamination of facial memory through exposure to misleading composite pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1985 Feb; Vol 70(1): 164 176
Jungman N; Levi A; Aperman A; Edelman S. Automatic classification of police mugshot album using principal component analysis. Proceedings of the SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering. vol.2243; 1994; p.591 4
Koehn, C. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1997). Constructing facial composites with the Mac A Mug Pro system. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3, 209 218.
Koehn, C. E., Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Using cognitive interviewing to construct facial composites. In D. Canter & L. Alison (Eds.), Psychology and Criminal Detection (pp. 41 63). Brookfield: Dartmouth.
Koehn, C. E. (1996, Feb). Theoretical and applied evaluations of facial composite systems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 56(8 B): 4640
Konen W. Comparing facial line drawings with gray level images: a case study on PHANTOMAS. Artificial Neural Networks ICANN 96. 1996 International Conference Proceedings. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany; 1996; xxv+922 pp.p.727 34
Koshimizu Hiroyasu; Tominaga Masafumi; Fujiwara Takayuki; Murakami Kazuhito. On KANSEI facial image processing for computerized facial caricaturing system PICASSOSO: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. v 6 1999, IEEE, USA. p VI 294 VI 299
Kovera, M. B., Penrod, S. D., Pappas, C., & Thill, D. L. (1997). Identification of computer generated facial composites. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 235 246.
Lander, Karen; Christie, Fiona; Bruce, Vicki. The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory and Cognition. 1999 Nov; Vol 27(6): 974 985
Laughery, K. R., Duval, C., & Fowler, R. H. (1977). An analysis of procedures for generating facial images (Mug File Project [Report No. UHMUG 2]). Houston, TX: University of Houston.
Laughery, K. R., Duval, C., & Wogalter, M. S. (1986). Dynamics of face recall. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, and A. W. Young (Eds.), Aspects of Face Processing (pp. 387). Dordrect: Martinus Nijhoff.
Laughery, K.R. & Fowler, R. (1980). Sketch artist and identi kit procedures for recalling faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 307 316.
Laughery, K.R. & Smith, V.L. (1978, October). Suspect identification following exposure to sketches and Identi kit composites. Presented at the 22nd annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, Detroit, MI.
Leder, Helmut; Bruce, Vicki. Inverting line drawings of faces. Swiss Journal of Psychology. 2000 Sep; Vol 59(3): 159 169
Lee Eric S; Whalen Thom. Empirical tests of a computer suspect identification system: An alternative to mugshot albums: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools for Design Development. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Petroleum Division (Publication) PD. v 64 n 5 1994, ASME, New York, NY, USA. p 389 394
Lee, E., & Whalen, T. (1995). Computerized feature retrieval of images: Suspect identification. Ergonomics, 38(9), 1941 1957.
Levi, A. M. (1998). Are defendants guilty if they were chosen in a lineup? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 389 407.
Levi, A. M.. Jungman. N.. Ginton, A.. Apennan. A.. & Noble. G. (1995). Using similarity judgements to conduct a mugshot album search. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 649 661.
Levi. A. M. (1997). Police composites: Do they contribute to convictions? Unpublished manuscript. Division of Identification and Police Science. Israeli Police Headquarters, Jerusalem.
Lin Chun Hung; Wu Ja Ling. Automatic facial feature extraction by genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. v 8 n 6 1999, p 834 845
Lipton, J. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 90 95.
Liu, Chang Hong; Collin, Charles A; Chaudhuri, Avi. Does face recognition rely on encoding of 3 D surface? Examining the role of shape from shading and shape from stereo. Perception. 2000; Vol 29(6): 729 743
Luu, T. N. & Geiselman, R. E. (1993). Cognitive retrieval techniques and order of feature construction in the formation of composite facial images. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 9, 34 39.
Matthews, Michael L. Discrimination of Identikit constructions of faces: Evidence for a dual processing strategy. Perception and Psychophysics. 1978 Feb; Vol 23(2): 153 161
Maudlin, M., & Laughery, K.R. (1981). Composite production effects on subsequent facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 351 357.
McNeil, J.E., Wray, J.L., Hibler, N.S., Foster, W.D., Rhyne, C.E., & Thibault, R. (1987). Hypnosis and identi kit: A study to determine the effect of using hypnosis in conjunction with the making of identi kit composites. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 63 67.
McQuiston, D. E. (2003). Verbal and visual processes in face recall: Assessing the role of perceptual expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at El Paso.
McQuiston, D. E., & Malpass, R. S. (2000). Use of facial composite systems in U.S. law enforcement agencies. Presented at the 2000 Biennial Meetings of the American Psychology Law Society, Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
Meissner C. A. & Brigham, J. C. (2001b). A meta analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15 (6), 603 616.
Meissner, C. A. & Brigham, J. C. (2001a). Thirty years of investigating the own race bias in memory for faces: A meta analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3 35.
Michael SD. Computer aided facial reconstruction for forensic identification. International Workshop on Volume Graphics. Preprint. Univ. Wales Swansea, Swansea, UK; 1999; 2 vol. xi+407 pp.p.239 64 vol.2
Murray, Janice E; Yong, Esther; Rhodes,
Gillian. Revisiting the perception of upside down faces.
Psychological Science. 2000 Nov; Vol 11(6): 492 496.
National Public Safety Information Bureau (1999).
National Directory of Law Enforcement Administrators,
Correctional Institutions and Related Agencies. SPAN
Publishing, Inc.
Nishino Junji; Yamamoto Masahiro; Shirai Haruhiko; Odaka Tomohiro; Ogura Hisakazu. Fuzzy linguistic facial caricature drawing system. SO: International Conference on Knowledge Based Intelligent Electronic Systems, Proceedings, KES. v 2 1998, p 15 20
O' Toole, Alice J; Bartlett, James C; Abdi, HerveA signal detection model applied to the stimulus: Understanding covariances in face recognition experiments in the context of face sampling distributions.. Visual Cognition. 2000 Apr; Vol 7(4): 437 463
O' Toole, Alice J; Vetter, Thomas; Blanz, Volker. Three dimensional shape and two dimensional surface reflectance contributions to face recognition: An application of three dimensional morphing. Vision Research. 1999 Sep; Vol 39(18): 3145 3155
Oliver Rodriguez, Juan Carlos. Electrophysiological measures of facial perception. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 1995 Aug; Vol 56(2 B): 1143
O'Toole, A.J. & Thompson, J.L. (1993).. An X Windows tool for synthesizing face images from eigenvectors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25(1), 41 7.
Parks, Theodore E.; Coss, Richard C.; Coss, Craig S.. Thatcher and the Cheshire cat: Context and the processing of facial features. Perception. 1985; Vol 14(6): 747 754
Penry, J. (1971). Looking at faces and remembering them: A guide to facial identification. London: Elek Books.
Pigott, M. & Brigham, J. C. (1985). Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 547 555.
Rakover, S. S., & Cahlon, B. (1996). To catch a thief with a recognition test: The model and some empirical results. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 423 468.
Rattner, A. (1988). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 12(3), 283-293.
Rhodes, G. (1988). Looking at faces: First order and second order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception, 17, 43 63.
Rhodes, G., Brake, S., Taylor, K., & Tan, S. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 313 331.
Rosenthal, Y., de Jager, G. & Greene, J. (1998). A computerised face recall system using eigenfaces. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cape Town.
Saks, M. J., Constantine, L., Dolezal, M., Garcia, J., Titus, C., Horton, G., Leavell, T., Muntz, J., Rivera, L., Stewart, J., Strumpf, F., & VanderHaar, H. (2001). Toward a Model Act for the Prevention and Remedy of Erroneous Convictions. New England Law Review, 35(3), 669 683.
Scapinello, F. F. & Yarmey, A. D. (1970). The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 21, 329 331.
Scheck, B. (March, 2002). The DNA Exoneration Cases. In Saul M. Kassin (Chair), Actual Innocence: Antecedents and Consequences of Wrongful Convictions. Symposium conducted at the 2002 Biennial Meeting of the American Psychology Law Society, Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, Austin, TX.
Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2001). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Doubleday.
Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configurational processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 221 242.
Sergent, J. (1988). Face perception and the right hemisphere. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.), Thought without Language (pp. 108 131). New York: Oxford University Press.
Shaharazam, I. (1986). The Mac-a-Mug Pro manual. Milwaukee, WI: Shaharazam.
Shapiro, P. & Penrod, S.D. (1986). A meta analysis of the facial identification literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139 156.
Shepherd, J. W. & Ellis, H. (1996). Face recall – methods and problems. In S.L. Sporer, R.S. Malpass and G. Köhnken (Eds.), Psychological Issues in Eyewitness Identification (pp. 87 115), Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Shepherd, J. W. (1986). A computer based face image retrieval system. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, and A. W. Young (Eds.), Aspects of Face Processing. Dordrect: Martinus Nijhoff.
Shepherd, J. W., Ellis, H. & Davies, G. (1982). Identification Evidence: A Psychological Evaluation. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Shepherd, John W.; Ellis, Hadyn D.; McMurran, Mary; Davies, Graham M.. Effect of character attribution on Photofit construction of a face. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1978 Apr Jun; Vol 8(2): 263 268
Smith and Wesson (2000). IdentiKit 2000. Smith & Wesson.
Solso, R. L. & McCarthy, J. E.. Prototype formation of faces: A case of pseudo memory. British Journal of Psychology. 1981 Nov; Vol 72(4): 499 503
Sporer, S. L. (1988). Long term improvement of facial recognition through visual rehearsal. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory (pp. 182 188). London: Wiley.
Sporer, S. L. (1989). Verbal and visual processes in person identification. In H. Wegener, F. Losel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal Behavior and the Justice System: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 303 324). New York: Springer.
Sporer, S. L. (1992). An archival analysis of person descriptions. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology Law Society in San Diego, CA.
Sporer, S. L. (1996). Psychological aspects of person descriptions. In S.L. Sporer, R.S. Malpass and G. Köhnken (Eds.), Psychological Issues in Eyewitness Identification (pp. 53 86), Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Tanaka, J. W. & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A(2), 225 245.
Tanaka, J. W. & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25(5), 583 592.
Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice. NCJ 178240.
Topp, L., McQuiston, D. E., & Malpass, R. S. (2003, July). Exploring composite production and its subsequent effects on eyewitness memory. Presented at the 2003 Meetings of the European-American Psychology-Law/American Psychology-Law Society, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Tredoux, C.G. (1996). Evaluating identification parades with measures of facial similarity. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cape Town.
Tredoux, C.G. (1999). A measure of facial similarity and some applications. Under revision for Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Tredoux, C.G., Rosenthal, Y., da Costa, L. & Nunez, D. (1999). Face reconstruction using a configural, eigenface based composite system. Paper presented at SARMAC III, Boulder Colorado, July 1999.
Turk, M. & Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71 86.
Uhl Robert G Jr.; da Vitoria Lobo Niels; Kwon Young H. Recognizing a facial image from a police sketch. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision Proceedings. 1994, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, USA,94TH06742. p 129 137
Uhl Robert G Jr.; Lobo Niels da Vitoria. Framework for recognizing a facial image from a police sketch. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1996, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, USA,96CB35909. p 586 593
Valentine, T. & Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 61, 259 273.
Valentine, T. (Ed.) (1995). Explorations in face space. London: Routledge.
Wells, G. L. & Hryciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory & Cognition, 12 (4), 338 344.
Wells, G. L. (1985). Verbal descriptions of faces from memory: Are they diagnostic of identification accuracy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 619 626.
Wells, G. L. (1988). Eyewitness identification: A system handbook. Toronto, Canada: Carswell.
Wells, G. L. (1995). Scientific study of witness memory: Implications for public and legal policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 726 731.
Wells, G. L., & Turtle, J. W. (1988). What is the best way to encode faces? In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues (pp. 163 168). New York: Wiley.
Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W., & Fulero, S. M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55(6), 581 598.
Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 23(6), 603 647.
Wells, G.L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R.S., Fulero, S.M., and Brimacombe, C.A.E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 23(6), 603-647.
Wogalter M. S., Laughery, K. R., & Thompson, B. G. (Manuscript). Face composite construction: Effects on subsequent recognition performance. .
Wogalter, M. S. & Marwitz, D. (1991). Face composite construction: In view and from memory quality and improvement with practice. Ergonomics, 34, 459 468.
Wogalter, M. S. (1987). Face memory: Effects of verbal description and visual rehearsal. Unpublished manuscript, University of Richmond, Virginia.
Wogalter, M.S. (1991). Effects of post exposure description and imaging on subsequent face recognition performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 35, 575 579.
Wogalter, M.S. (1996). Describing faces from memory: Accuracy and effects on subsequent recognition performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40, 536 540.
Wogalter, M. S., Marwitz, D. B. & Leonard, D. C.. Suggestiveness in photospread line ups: Similarity induces distinctiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1992 Sep Oct; Vol 6(5): 443 453
Woodhead, M. M., Baddeley, A. D., & Simmonds, D. C. (1979). On training people to recognize faces. Ergonomics, 22, 333 343.
Young, A. W. & Willis, H. D. (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of research on face processing. Amsterdam. North Holland.
Young, A., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747 759.
Yu, C. J. & Geiselman, R. E. (1993). Effect of constructing Identi kit composites on photospread identification performance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(3), 280 292.
Bibliographies | Consultation | Current Research | Lab Members | Lab Publications | Links | Contact Us | Home